RFCs in HTML Format


RFC 0756

RFC: 756                                                July 1979



    The NIC Name Server--A Datagram Based Information Utility

                         by

   John R. Pickens, Elizabeth J. Feinler, and James E. Mathis


                            July 1979

                        SRI International
               Telecommunications Sciences Center
                         333 Ravenswood
                  Menlo Park, California 94025

(Also published in Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Conference
on Distributed Data Management and Computer Networks)           

Abstract In this paper a new method for distributing and updating host name/address information in large computer networks is described. The technique uses datagrams to provide a simple transaction-based query/response service. A provisional service is being provided by the Arpanet Network Information Center (NIC) and is used by mobile packet radio terminals, as well as by several Arpanet DEC-10 hosts. Extensions to the service are suggested that would expand the query functionality to allow more flexible query formats as well as queries for service addresses. Several architectural approaches with potential for expansion into a distributed internet environment are proposed. This technique may be utilized in support of other distributed applications such as user identification and group distribution for computer based mail. 1. INTRODUCTION In large computer networks, such as the Arpanet [1], network-wide standard host-addressing information must be maintained and distributed. To fulfill that need, the Arpanet Network Information Center (NIC) at SRI International has maintained, administered, and distributed the host addressing data base to Arpanet hosts since 1972 [2]. The most common method for maintaining an up-to-date copy on each host is to bulk-transfer the entire data base to each host individually. This technique satisfies most host addressing needs on the Arpanet today. However, some hosts maintain neither a complete nor a current copy of the data base because of limited memory capacity and infrequent processing of updates. In addition, with the expansion of the Arpanet into the internet environment [3, 4], a strong need has arisen for new techniques to augment the distribution of name/address information. One method currently being investigated is the dynamic distribution of host-address information via a transaction-based, inquiry-response process called the Name Server [5, 6]. To support this investigation, the NIC has developed a provisional Name Server that is compatible with a level of service specified in the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) Internet experiment [5]. The basic Name Server is described in this paper and a set of additional functions that such a service might be expected to support is proposed. The discussion is structured as follows: Section 1 describes the NIC Name Server and how it is derived from the NIC data base service. Section 2 describes extensions of the name server which allow a richer syntax and queries for service addresses. Section SRI International [Page 1]

3 discusses architectural issues, and presents some preliminary thoughts on how to evolve from the current centralized, hierarchic service to a distributed Name Server service. 2. THE NIC NAME SERVER A Name Server service has been installed on SRI-KA, an Arpanet DEC-10. Inquiry-response access is via the Internet Name Server protocol [5], which in turn employs the DARPA Internet Protocol, IP4 [7]. To demonstrate the service a simple interactive facility is provided to format user input into name server requests--e.g. a query of the form !ARPANET!FOO-TENEX returns an address such as "10 2 0 9" (NET=10, HOST=2, LOGICALHOST=0, IMP=9; for details of host address formats see [8]). User access to the name server has been implemented on several Arpanet DEC-10 TENEX and Packet Radio Network LSI-11 Terminal Interface Unit (TIU) hosts [9, 10]. While the TENEX program serves primarily as a demonstration vehicle, the LSI-11 program provides a valuable augmentation of the TIU's host table. A typical scenario is that when the packet radio TIU is initiated or initialized, it contains only a minimal host table, with the addresses of a few candidate name servers. The user queries the name server with a simple manual query process, and then uses the address obtained to open a TELNET connection to the desired host. The information to support the name server originates from the NIC's Arpanet host address data base. An optimized version of this data base is presented to the name server upon program initiation as an input file. 3. NAME SERVER ISSUES The basic name server provides a simple address-binding service [5]. In response to a datagram query [7, 11], the name server returns either an address, a list of similar names if a unique match is not found, or an error indication. Several useful additional functions can be envisioned for the name server such as service queries and broader access to host-related information. 3.1. Similar Names An important issue to be resolved is that of the interpretation given to the "similar names" response. A standard definition should be given and not be left to implementors' whims. [Page 2] SRI International

If the "similar names" response is used primarily to provide helpful information to a human-interface process, then it may be useful to model the behavior of the name server on the behavior of other known processes that present host name information on demand. An example of this is a common implementation of virtual terminal access on the Arpanet, User TELNET [12], in which three different functions occur: 1. Upon termination of host name input (e.g. <CR>), the user is warned only with an audible alarm if the name used is not unique. If the name is unique, the name is completed, and the requested operation is initiated. 2. In response to <ESC>, either the name will be completed if unique or the user will be warned with an audible alarm if the name is not unique. 3. Only in response to "?" will a list of similar names be printed. "Similar names", in this case, means all names that begin with the same character string. The list is alphabetized. In support of this style of user interface, it may be appropriate to return the "similar names" response only when requested. Two ways to achieve this might be either to set an option bit or to use "?" to force the similar names response. 3.2. Query Syntax A second issue in the provision of name server service is that of query syntax. The basic level of service previously described allows only a few query functions. With more intelligent name servers, complex queries can be supported. The current Internet name server requires two fields in the query string--a network name field and a host name field. If the network field is non-existent, a local network query is assumed. Since network independent queries are desirable, an expanded query functionality must be specified. One way this might be done is to add to the notion of "missing field", which means "local", the notion of a special character like "*", which means "all". The semantic range of queries afforded by adopting this convention is listed below (Note: ~ is used to mean "null". If both network and host fields are null the representation is "~ ~". "N" means "network" and "H" means "host"): SRI International [Page 3]

~ ~ local net, local host (validity check?) ~ * local net, all hosts ~ H local net, named host * ~ all nets, local host (inverse search) * * all nets, all hosts (probably prohibited) * H all nets, named host N ~ named net, local host (inverse search) N * named net, all hosts N H named net, named host By combining the on-demand similar-names function, "all" and "local", and by allowing "*" to be prefixed or appended to the query string as a wild card character, one can query as follows: ~ SRI*? All hosts named SRI* on local net * SRI*? All hosts named SRI* on all nets * *UNIX*? All hosts named *UNIX* on all nets 3.3. Service Queries It has been suggested that the name server be generalized into a binding function [13, 14]. In this context, allowing service queries is a very useful extension. One application of this service, that exists within the Packet Radio Project at SRI, is the need to find the addresses of Hosts that support the LoaderServer service--a service that allows packet radio TIUs to receive executable programs via downline loading. Service querying, unlike host names querying, requires a multiple response capability. The querying process would, upon receiving multiple service descriptors, attempt to establish access to each service, one at a time, until successful. Service descriptors consist of an official name, a list of alias names, and a network-dependent address. In the case of Arpanet Internet services, this address field would consist of the host address(32 bits), port(32 bits), and protocol number(8 bits). For Arpanet NCP services, the address would consist of a host address(24 bits) and a socket(32 bits). [Page 4] SRI International

Syntactically, service queries can be derived from host queries by the addition of a service name field, as below: NET HOST SERVICE A network-independent service query, for example, can be represented as: * * SERVICE 3.4. Name Server Options The concept of options has been introduced in the discussion of the "similar names" function. Another group of options may be used to specify the format of the reply. At one extreme is the compact, binary, style such as exists in the basic level of service. At the other extreme is an expanded, textual, style such as is represented by a NIC host table record with official and alias names included. Options can be envisioned that specify: - Binary versus text format - Inclusion of each field in the reply - Inclusion of official name, per field, in the reply - Inclusion of alias names, per field, in the reply - Inclusion of other miscellaneous information, such as operating system, machine type, access restrictions, and so on. Other options can be envisioned that specify the scope of the search, such as "find SERVER hosts only". An alternate form for specifying formats might be to settle on several standard ones, and allow an option to select among them. Certainly, not all name servers can support all such options, and not all options are equally useful. Thus, the proposed list will be expanded or contracted to fit the actual needs of processes using the name server service. 3.5. MORE DATA Protocol It should be noted that some of the proposed name server extensions have the potential for generating more than a single datagram's worth of reply, since the current DARPA Internet Protocol limits the size which all networks must support to 576 octets [15]. In spite of this, the size of such replies need not require a full-blown stream protocol. Several alternatives SRI International [Page 5]

exist: 1. Disallow options that imply large replies. 2. Truncate the packet for large replies. 3. Ignore the recommended maximum datagram size. 4. Utilize an alternate base protocol for such requests. 5. Develop a MORE DATA protocol. If alternative 1 is chosen, the potential for overflow exists, even with the basic level of service. Alternative 2 implies unpredictable behavior to the user of the name server service. Alternative 3 reduces the availability of the service. Alternative 4 is certainly possible, but may be overkill. Alternative 5 appears to be a reasonable solution and could be implemented very simply. The name server could return, as part of the reply, a code of the following form: +------+---------+ | MORE | ID_NEXT | +------+---------+ where ID_NEXT is a name-server-chosen quantity that allows the name server to find the next block of reply, the next time it is queried. This quantity may be an internal pointer, a block number, or whatever the name server chooses. Follow-on queries may be implemented by recomputing the entire original query and discarding output until the ID_NEXT block is reached, or by efficiently storing the entire reply in a cache, fragmented into blocks (with appropriate decay algorithms). 3.6. Dynamic Updates In the previous discussion, the host name data base was assumed to have been a static or slowly changing entity with an administrative and manual update authority. This model reflects most of the network needs in the Arpanet and Internet communities. However, dynamic automated updating of the host table may be needed in the future, especially in mobile environments such as the Packet Radio Network. In a closed user group community (such as a local network of mutually trusting hosts), dynamic updating becomes simply a technical question concerning packet formats. In wider communities, a mechanism to authenticate the change request must be developed; however, the authentication issue is outside the scope of this paper. [Page 6] SRI International

4. ARCHITECTURE The Name Server concept is invaluable for allowing hosts with incomplete knowledge of the network address space to obtain full access to network services. Whether for reasons of insufficient kernel space or of dynamically changing environments, the need for the service is little questioned. However, significant design issues revolve around the methods for providing the service and for administering and updating the data base. In the current NIC Name Server, the service is centralized, and is supported by a data base administered by a single authority. In the long range, other architectures are possible that present more flexible ways to distribute host information within and between networks and administrative entities. These present opportunities for dynamic, automated, approaches to the maintenance and sharing of data--particularly host name data. From an evolutionary point of view, initial Name Server services will likely exist as a centralized service, possibly with one large Name Server that has knowledge of multiple networks. From this beginning, an expansion in two orthogonal directions can be envisioned. - In the direction of internal distribution, the name server can be partitioned into multiple, cooperating processes on separate hosts. The data base can be replicated exactly or managed as a distributed data base. - In the direction of administrative distribution, multiple autonomous name servers may exist that exchange data in an appropriate fashion, on a per network or other administrative basis. For hosts with small host tables, caching might be used, whereby local, temporary copies would be maintained of subsets of the addressing data base. Such copies may be obtained either by remembering previous queries made of name servers, or by receiving automatic distributions of data from name servers. For mobile hosts, in which even the home network is unknown, it would be possible to maintain a very sparse table with the addresses of only a few name servers. For hosts lacking even the knowledge of name server addresses, a very primitive name server function can be provided by all network hosts that would allow real name servers to be located; e.g., a query of the form "* * RealNameServer" addressed to an arbitrarily selected host could elicit the address of a real Name Server. Finally, the possibility exists for multiple name servers to communicate dynamically in attempting to resolve queries. If, SRI International [Page 7]

for example, a name server on the Arpanet receives a query for a host on the Packet Radio Network, then the Arpanet name server can conceivably query the Packet Radio Network Name Server to resolve the reply. 5. FUTURE WORK The techniques discussed in this paper for providing dynamic access to and maintenance of host address information are generally applicable to other information-providing services. Two possibilities currently under investigation at SRI include user identification servers [16] and time servers, which offer people/address and time-stamp information, respectively, as datagram driven information utilities. Further work is needed to refine the implementation of the name server and its using query processes. Two items in particular are direct system calls into the NIC data base management system for general access to host information and process-level query interfaces for using processes. The design issues for efficient implementation are complex and involve some trade-offs. The most obvious trade-off is volume of network traffic versus "freshness" of information. The local host table handler can either send a message to the name server for every address request, or it can use some type of local cache to remember frequently requested names. SRI is exploring both the process-level interface for the LSI-11 TIU and the problems of local host table management in small machines operating in a dynamic environment. Information services such as the Name Server are integral components of distributed systems and applications. However, the effective utilization of such services is a relatively unstudied and unexplored area. One area in which SRI plans to study their impact on distributed architectures is in computer based mail applications. Information utilities in this environment can range from the support of simple mailbox address queries to complex address list management needed for inter-organizational and group resolution. 6. CONCLUSION A provisional Name Server service, based on the NIC host address data base was described in this paper. In addition, a collection of design ideas for an internet Name Server service has been presented. Work is continuing on the refinement of the NIC name server service. New requirements and opportunities for functional distribution are being investigated. Many questions have been [Page 8] SRI International

raised in exploring an expansion of the existing service. Such an expansion is expected to result in more useful support of internet (and intranet) capability. REFERENCES 1. L. G. Roberts and B. D. Wessler, "Computer Network Development to Achieve Resource Sharing," in Proceedings of SJCC, pp. 543-549 (AFIP, 1970). 2. M. D. Kudlick and E. J. Feinler, Host Names On-line, RFC 608, Stanford Research Institute, Menlo Park, California (January 1974). 3. V. G. Cerf and R. E. Kahn, "A Protocol for Packet Network Interconnection," IEEE Transactions on Communication Technology, Vol. COM-22, pp. 637-641 (1974)._ 4. V. G. Cerf and P. T. Kirstein, "Issues in Packet-Network Interconnection," Proc. IEEE, Vol. 66, No. 11, pp. 1386-1408 (November 1978). 5. J. Postel, Internet Name Server, IEN 89, Information Sciences Institute, Univ. of Southern Calif., Marina Del Rey, California, May 1979. 6. J. R. Pickens, E. J. Feinler and J. E. Mathis, An Experimental Network Information Center Name Server (NICNAME), IEN 103, SRI International, Menlo Park, California (May 1979). 7. J. Postel, Internet Protocol, IEN 81, Information Sciences Institute, Univ. of Southern Calif., Marina Del Rey, California (February 1979). 8. J. Postel, Address Mappings, IEN 91, Information Sciences Institute, Univ. of Southern Calif., Marina Del Rey, California (May 1979). 9. R. E. Kahn, "The Organization of Computer Resources into a Packet Radio Network," IEEE Transactions on Communications, Vol. COM-25, No. 1, pp. 169-178 (January 1977). 10. R. E. Kahn, S. A. Gronemeyer, J. Burchfiel, and R. C. Kunzelman, "Advances in Packet Radio Technology," Proc. IEEE, Vol. 66, No. 11, pp. 1468-1496 (November 1978). 11. J. Postel, User Datagram Protocol, IEN 88, Information Sciences Institute, Univ. of Southern Calif., Marina Del Rey, California (May 1979). SRI International [Page 9]

12. E. Leavitt, TENEX USER'S GUIDE, Bolt Beranek and Newman, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts. 13. R. Bressler, A Proposed Experiment With a Message Switching Protocol (section on Information Operator), pp. 26-31, RFC 333, Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc, Cambridge, Mass. (May 15, 1972). 14. Y. Dalal, Internet Meeting, January 24,25 1979, (Group Discussion). 15. J. Postel, Internet Meeting Notes - 25,26 January 1979, pp. 12, IEN 76, Information Sciences Institute, Univ. of Southern Calif., Marina Del Rey, California (February 1979). 16. E. J. Feinler, "The Identification Data Base in a Networking Environment," in NTC '77 Conference Record, pp. 21:3 (IEEE, 1977). [Page 10] SRI International

Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. THE NIC NAME SERVER 2 3. NAME SERVER ISSUES 2 3.1. Similar Names 2 3.2. Query Syntax 3 3.3. Service Queries 4 3.4. Name Server Options 5 3.5. MORE DATA Protocol 5 3.6. Dynamic Updates 6 4. ARCHITECTURE 7 5. FUTURE WORK 8 6. CONCLUSION 8 REFERENCES 9 SRI International [Page i]



Back to RFC index

 

 



Sponsered-Sites:

 

 

"Marriage is made in heaven--so is thunder and lightning. "